Bhau's Boat Bridge Plan & The Unfair Blame (April-June 1760)
Marathi History Book Reading Session Summary
The Boat Bridge Strategy
The Order to Govindapant:
"Find out how you can build a bridge out of boats."
Why:
- Bhau's army traveling to Doab
- Must cross Yamuna river
- To meet Suja-ud-Daula
- Fight Abdali in the Doab
The Timing Problem:
- Left Patadur March 14, 1760
- Takes 2-3 months to reach Yamuna
- By then: Monsoon starts (June-July)
- River will be full
- Must prepare bridge in advance
Why the Whole Army Had to Move
The Threat:
"Abdali was waiting in the north. He was actually in Doab himself. So that would just be an opportunity for him to strike."
The Lesson:
- Learned from Taji Shinde's fate
- Learned from Holkar's defeats
- Can't risk small contingent
- Must be properly protected
Abdali's Timing Advantage
The Critical Detail:
"Before Sadashiv Rao Bhau was chosen as leader, Abdali was already in Anupshahar."
Anupshahar:
- In the Doab itself
- In Suja's territory
- Abdali camped there before Bhau even selected
The Sequence:
- Abdali arrives → camps in Suja's land
- Taji dies → news reaches Pune
- Meeting at Udgir → Bhau chosen
- Result: Abdali has huge head start
The Unfair Blame on Bhau
Why He Gets Blamed:
"Sadashiv Rao Bhau is blamed for the fall of Panipat battle."
- 100,000+ killed
- Prestige lost
- Enormous damage
Why It's Unfair:
"That was not entirely his fault. Over the years, Shinde and Holkar armies had created that environment."
What They Created:
- Harassed Rajputs constantly
- Harassed Suraj Mal Jat
- Only wanted tributes, money
- Made natural allies into enemies
Bhau's Innocence:
- Had nothing to do with it
- First time crossing Narmada
- First time in north
- Inheriting the whole mess
- Politics of north already poisoned
Bajirao I: The Strategic Genius
Why Shahu Chose Him:
"Shinde and Holkar were good fighters. But they had no brains."
Their Mistakes:
- Only looked at tactical advantages
- Harassed Rajasthan princes for money
- Made them mad
- Lost natural allies
Bajirao I's Difference:
- Not just fighter - had brains
- Great warrior AND great statesman
- Strategic thinker
His Principle:
"You cannot make enemies out of our natural allies."
The Tree Analogy
Shahu's Test:
- "Who is biggest enemy of Marathas?"
- "How would you deal with Mughals?"
Bajirao's Answer:
"You can go after branches of big tree. But if you cut the trunk, entire tree comes down. You don't have to go after each and every branch."
The Strategy:
- Trunk = Mughal Empire
- Branches = Small kingdoms they spawned
- Go after the trunk, not branches
- Strategic over tactical thinking
Why This Mattered:
- Shahu chose 19-year-old Bajirao
- Over experienced commanders
- Because he had strategic vision
- "That turned out to be correct decision"
Bhau's Reconciliation Attempts
Messengers Sent (Late April 1760):
- To Madhav Singh of Jaipur
- To Vijay Singh of Jodhpur
What He Asked:
- Send troops
- Send funds
- Send supplies
His Pitch:
"We are all Indians. We live in India. Abdali is outright foreigner and has no business here. We should all be on same side."
The Vision:
- Unite all Indian powers
- Fight foreign army together
- Even tried to include Rohilas
- But difficult to convince after years of harassment
Why Govindapant Failed
The Assignment:
- Build bridge out of boats
- Meet Suja-ud-Daula
- Convince him to join
Why It Failed:
"Could not accomplish the task given to him."
The Problems:
- Couldn't reach Suja to convince
- Couldn't build bridge across Yamuna
Why:
- Abdali's forces lurking around Itawa
- 10,000-20,000 Afghan soldiers moving
- Govindapant only had 4,000-5,000 soldiers
- Didn't want to start skirmish (would lose)
- Bridge takes weeks to build
- Too vulnerable during construction
Key Figures
| Name | Role |
|---|---|
| Sadashiv Rao Bhau | Gets unfair blame, inherited mess |
| Bajirao I | Strategic genius, chose trunk over branches |
| Shahu | King with foresight, chose Bajirao at 19 |
| Shinde/Holkar | "No brains," harassed natural allies |
| Govindapant Bundele | Failed mission (not his fault) |
Major Themes
1. The Inherited Mess
Bhau inherits years of bad diplomacy. Rajputs angry, Suraj Mal angry, natural allies driven away.
2. Strategic vs Tactical
Bajirao I understood strategy (trunk). Shinde/Holkar only understood tactics (grab money now).
3. Politics > Military
"Politics is biggest part of battle. Physical battle is just fighting in different way to resolve differences."
4. Timing is Everything
Abdali in Anupshahar before Bhau even chosen. Head start is massive.
5. The Bridge Problem
Can't build bridge with enemy around. Maratha weakness at river crossings apparent.
Geographic Context
- Anupshahar: In Doab, Suja's territory, where Abdali camped
- Itawa: Only Maratha-held city in Doab, surrounded by Afghan forces
- Yamuna: Major river crossing needed
Where we left off: Bhau trying to undo years of damage. Sent messengers to Rajputs. Ordered bridge built. But Govindapant can't accomplish either - Afghan forces everywhere. Abdali already in position. Bhau still hundreds of miles away. The political damage may be irreversible.
"If only Bajirao had no brains" successors. Now Bhau, capable but inexperienced in north, inherits their mess. Trying to fix it, but Abdali's timing advantage and river-crossing weakness may prove fatal.